[Milsurplus] [RCA] SRR-13 Article, more
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Tue Aug 2 13:39:48 EDT 2016
On 2 Aug 2016 at 16:58, antqradio at sbcglobal.net wrote:
> Ken
> My test was only for 6 hours with a modified power supply using the FRR-23 as a
> test bed. With 60 VA ac power input, the temperature reached and stabilized at
> 107 degrees internally and the top of the case was just barely warm. I can
> imagine that a rack of stacked receivers with unmodified power supplies with
> about 100 VA ac power input would be a bit different.
Well, I am not convinced that that is the only reason. But, as I said, it was a long time ago.
> I have made two sets of brackets so that the FRR-23 and the working SRR-13A
> can be rack mounted.
I have a number of the original rack-mount adapters for these receivers. They are VERY
heavy steel! I can send you a set if you would like to have them. At least you could use them
as models. ;-)
> This makes working on rhe receivers much easier than
> struggling with a receiver that is table mounted. One interesting problem that
> popped up with the SRR-13A is that when in the case and rack mounted, it
> started tripping the shop GFCI.
Hmmmmm....not good....
> Since the GFCI only trips when the SRR-13A power switch is turned ON,
> perhaps there is an issue with leakage in the power supply?
Well, as you know, there are very extensive filters in the back-plane of those receivers. I
would suspect bypass capacitors right at the AC input. This is a common problem with
R-390s for instance.
> But the receiver
> operates correctly on the bench with a direct connection for ac power to the rear
> connector. Anyway, using a constant voltage ferroresonant isolation transformer
> cured the problem. Now I have to investigate why there is a difference between
> the SRR-13A and the FRR-23 which does not have this particular issue. Always
> something to look into!
Oh, yes. This is what makes this stuff fun! :-)
>
> I did notice that the back apron of the SRR-13A has one less BNC connector
> then the FRR-23. This extra BNC connector allows the FRR-23 to have a
> remote First Oscillator. I guess this is for the diversity setup that allows the LO of
> one of the FRR-23 receivers to be slaved to the other. While the SRR-13A is
> also capable of diversity reception, each must evidently use independent local
> oscillators.
Yes.
> More to come after I do some housekeeping in the shop!
Boy! Me too!!! :-(
Ken
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list