[Milsurplus] U.S. Army TRF LF receiver 1934
Richard
brunneraa1p at comcast.net
Tue Nov 10 15:58:57 EST 2015
Yes. I have two RAL's, and when connected back-to-back, antenna input
to antenna input, I cannot hear one oscillating in the other, even at 23
Mcs.
Richard, AA1P
The Navy specified a very low radiation level at the antenna, something
like a few micro-micro-watts of radiation at the antenna connection, and
the TRFs that the Navy used all met that specification. National had to
add a second RF amp stage to one of their superhets before the Navy
would accept it for use on ships. In fact, from my reading, many of the
old Navy radio ops preferred the RAK/RAL over the newer RBB/RBC since
they insisted that the earlier receivers were less susceptible to
overload by nearby transmitters due to their more extensive shielding.
Ken W7EKB ______________________________________________________________
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list