[Milsurplus] [ARC5] ARB Canvas Cover

[Mike Hanz]

Those are certainly valid questions. ZB-*, DU-*, GP-*, and GO-* 
equipment come to mind most quickly. But why would one need covers for 
USAAF BC-*** test equipment (or for Navy equivalents) that were used in 
the hanger deck?  With the greatest of respect, I might suggest getting 
a copy of the Aircraft Radio Maintenance Notes (ARMN) and getting back 
to the original authors with those questions. :-)

I'm not gonna attempt to defend the photographs of corrosion problems 
nor the cautions with respect to certain Navy aircraft "leakers" in 1944 
and 1945.  Folks like Robert Downs, Mike Morrow, and others on this 
reflector clearly understand the reality of the surface vessel flight 
deck in the pacific far better than I can even begin to articulate.  The 
only salt spray in my teeth was on the patio of a Navy Officer's Club in 
Panama during a Pacific storm.  Exhilarating, even a bit tastey, but of 
little use for the issue you raised.

I'm not being obdurate - simply describing what I see in the documents I 
have here, and what the limitations of my data represent.  I can 
speculate from here to Sunday....but debate? I'm not qualified in the 
environment beyond reading and summarizing the printed word.

Very 73,
-Mike

On 3/1/2013 8:43 PM, J. Forster wrote:
> What about everything else in the cockpit? I've never seen covers for
> anything except the ARB; portable test gear like the BC-221 and BC-906,
> BC-1066; and gear used outs1de AFVs on the ground.
>
> -John
>
> ===================
>> Plus, while staged on the flight deck in the South and Central Pacific,
>> the
>> canopy is probably open. If you can see the radio while standing on the
>> wing root, so can the rain.
>>
>> In a message dated 03/01/2013 17:55:02 PM Central Standard Time,
>> aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org writes:
>>> Salt spray and drips.  Think a fighter staged on a carrier deck, with a
>>> strong wind over the bow and a significant sea state, not to mention an
>>> eternally leaky canopy. It happened.  The ARMN has photos of the results
>>> to connectors and the like.
>>>
>>> On 3/1/2013 6:34 PM, J. Forster wrote:
>>>> A canvass cover for my ARB just arrived and in trying it out, it seems
>>>> that the radio is fully operable from the remotes with the cover in
>>> place.
>>>> Does anybody know what was the cover's real purpose ? Ican well
>>> understand
>>>> a canvass cover for a WS19 Field Station, but the ARB??
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> -John
>>>>
>> Robert Downs - Houston
>> wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
>> MVPA 9480
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Milsurplus mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>