[Milsurplus] [Fwd: [Boatanchors] comment window open for RF Exposure proposed rule]

[C.Whitaker]

de WB2CPN
Stupidity didn't just get invented.
Some Trivia:  I was in USAF on Okinawa in
the early 60's, and working in Staff Communications.
Army controlled the use of the RF spectrum.
A contractor who was building an additional runway
asked for frequencies for VHF radios for his trucks.
Army said,
"No, there is already too much electromagnetic
radiation on Okinawa, and it is unhealthy for the
indigenous personnel."
Question:  "Does RF exposure make the hair come
off dogs?"
73
Clete
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




On 6/4/2013 8:44 AM, J. Forster wrote:
> ---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
> Subject: [Boatanchors] comment window open for RF Exposure proposed rule
> From:    "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo at gmail.com>
> Date:    Tue, June 4, 2013 3:55 am
> To:      "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
> <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
>           "Boat Anchors List" <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The FCC revision to the guidelines for RF exposure have now been
> published in the Federal Register:
>
> https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/06/04/2013-12713/reassessment-of-exposure-to-radiofrequency-electromagnetic-fields-limits-and-policies
> and
> https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/06/04/2013-12716/human-exposure-to-radiofrequency-electromagnetic-fields
>
> 360 comments have been filed, mostly from people who believe RF is
> killing life as we know it.
>
> Here is the schedule for comments:
>
> Comments must be filed on or before September 3, 2013, and reply
> comments must be filed on or before November 1, 2013.
>
> The dockets are: ET Docket No. 03-137, and Notice of Inquiry, ET
> Docket No. 13-84, FCC 13-39, adopted March 27, 2012 and released March
> 29, 2012.
>
> Go here: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/
>
> and in the top box enter for example 03-137 for proceeding number.
>
> A review of the existing filed comments will show that most of them
> are from people who claim they get headaches from RF and "doctors" who
> agree. example:
>
> "Electromagnetic chaos within all technological creation causes
> malfunction on brain and human DNA
> and lower the use of it and added extreme protection will benefit everybody."
>
> It's important hams file rational comments to balance the hysteria of
> some of the currently filed comments. There are 360 filed so far, most
> from people who seem to think RF is dangerous to all living things.
> There are also comments filed by something called the EMR Policy
> Institute.
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
> ______________________________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>