[Milsurplus] [ARC5] Oddball RAX Receiver

[hwhall at compuserve.com]

But weren't the Catalinas PBY-4, PBY-5, etc., instead of PB4-Y? 

 Wayne
WB4OGM



-----Original Message-----
From: David Stinson <arc5 at ix.netcom.com>
To: ARC-5 List <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>; ARC-5 Yahoo <ARC-5radio at yahoogroups.com>; milsurplus <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tue, Aug 27, 2013 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: [ARC5] Oddball RAX Receiver

 
 
 
 Thanks to everyone who took a look at this. 
The concensus looks to be: 
 
     MODIFIED FOR OPERATIONAL 
        FLIGHT TRAINING PB4-Y 
         DO NOT INSTALL  
           IN AIRPLANE 
 
We do know that the PB4-Y used the RAX / ART-13  
in the Laision role, so this would made sense. 
 
Thanks again! 
73 Dave AB5S 
  
p.s. No, I'm not planning to bid. 
Already have them in the que. 
 
 
 
______________________________________________________________ 
ARC5 mailing list 
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5 
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net 
 
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html