[Milsurplus] ARC 65 vs ARC 58
J. Forster
jfor at quikus.com
Fri Jun 29 11:28:07 EDT 2012
Yes, but now there is higher speed traffic in the skies over the entire
world. I'd think there is a lot more commo trafic now.
A 747 probably c0ommunicates a lot more than a B-52, which went to a
predetermined area and orbited, unless redirected.
-John
===========
> Can you spell HEIGHT O-F T-H-E C-O-L-D W-A-R? Do you remember
> continuous, constant airborne alert flights carrying nuclear weapons?
> With all the potential for Armageddon due to failure of positive command
> and control...I remember, I was there...
>
>
> J. Forster wrote:
>
>>>Everyone must understand the urgency for reliable communications in
>>>the 1950's and 60's. There were too many missions that had to have
>>>constant "Command and Control".
>>
>>
>> Why, then more than previously or afterwards?
>>
>> -John
>>
>> ===============
>>
>>
>>
>> That's why all the different sets and
>>
>>>companies. We took what we could get and the fastest supplier was was
>>>usually the choice. Adapt, modify, what ever it took. The days of
>>>going over the "pond" and not talking to anyone for hours were over,
>>>not to mention over the ice cap - - - for a while even the B-47 has
>>>Collins 18S-4's installed.
>>>
>
>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list