[Milsurplus] [ARC5] [MRCA] AN/PRC-74 Schematics
John Watkins
jpwatkins9 at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 4 09:37:00 EST 2012
To bad that LOGSA is not more open to the public. I understand the need to keep the modern comsec stuff under wraps, but to reclassify the Vietnam stuff after 9/11 and even some Korean war radios was a bit over the top. A lot of the VRC-12 material is not available anymore nor some PRC manuals. Wonder where some of that has gone? It was digital so should still be somewhere. Anyone still in the military that knows? Also how about our international friends, do you have a spot to download from or do you have the same problem?
John. WD5ENU
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 2, 2012, at 20:02, Robert Newberry <N1XBM at amsat.org> wrote:
> These guys cover everything from the beginning up to current. They have
> quite the archive.
> On Dec 2, 2012 9:00 PM, "J. Forster" <jfor at quikus.com> wrote:
>
>> I know there are several antique wireless museums that focus on pre- WWII
>> stuff. That is of little interest to me.
>>
>> My interest is in the real engineering design, which really started in
>> WWII. Just look at electronics that was made in 1935 v. one from 1945.
>>
>> -John
>>
>> ===========
>>
>>
>>
>>> There is also the antique radio and Wireless communication museum
>> ...think
>>> I got the name wrong in Windsor, CT that tries very hard to preserve this
>>> info too.
>>>
>>> I watched a PBS documentary on a guy who collected vinyl records.
>>> According
>>> to the national archives all of the music that was put to vinyl on 10% is
>>> available to the public. They said this guy has over 80% of all vinyl
>> ever
>>> made.
>>>
>>> Sad thing is ...no one cares or is interested he can't find anyone
>>> interested in it. He is trying to find a home for his collection valued
>> at
>>> over 50 million his asking price is 8 million ...still no offers.
>>> On Dec 2, 2012 8:02 PM, "J. Forster" <jfor at quikus.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 1, 2012, at 2:40 PM, J. Forster wrote:
>>>>>> BUT, my concern is long term.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where I worked till retirement (National institute of Standards and
>>>> Technology) I knew a fellow who was their expert in microfilm. He and
>>>> the US National Archivist were on first name basis. He strongly
>>>> believed that the way to make stuff available to the most people most
>>>> easily was with computers. He also adamantly believed that the ONLY way
>>>> to preserve printed information for the LONG term was microfilm. Period.
>>>>
>>>> Yes and no.
>>>>
>>>> I like computers because they and the SW are now mature and stable
>>>> enough
>>>> that the information can be copied and distributed at essentially no
>>>> cost.
>>>> Furthermore, the files can be stored on any technology, from 8" floppies
>>>> to Flash RAM, to hard drives to CDs and DVDs to cloud servers. OIf you
>>>> want backups, they are just a click away.
>>>>
>>>> Microfilm or fiche is largely a dying format, IMO. Just try and get a
>>>> fiche duplicated. I was able to, but it took going to MIT Graphic Arts
>>>> to
>>>> get it done. Also, the media, either silver or dry diazo, is not
>>>> eternal.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, it takes special rquipment to get a hard copy of even 1 page.
>>>> Also, if the image is corrupted, you are screwed. Andsome of the images
>>>> I've seen are pretty bad.
>>>>
>>>> IMO, the way to go for mere mortal is Acrobat or a clone that makes
>>>> compatible files.
>>>>
>>>>>> ... Google, by scanning it incompletely, is
>>>>>> hastening the very loss of information they are seeking to preserve.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think they do not really have a noble, altruistic, conservators
>>>> viewpoint on preserving stuff. They really only want profit.
>>>>> Claiming to have scanned lots of stuff is just part of that.
>>>>
>>>> No argument.
>>>>
>>>> In fact, Google is probably using their other businesses to data mine.
>>>> An
>>>> example:
>>>>
>>>> A couple of days ago, I received an email link of a snow globe. The text
>>>> said 'enter your street address to see a pic of your house in the
>>>> globe'.
>>>> Oh, BTW, you had to have Cookies enabled or it would not work.
>>>>
>>>> Well, the app is simple... it grabs a pic of the address you enter from
>>>> Google Street View and pastes it into the snow globe.
>>>>
>>>> The site is: http://www.draftfcb.com/holiday2011/
>>>>
>>>> BUT, Google now has set a Cookie in your computer and can tie that to
>>>> the
>>>> street address you entered. Sure, you may have entered a friends address
>>>> also, but while gathering Street View pics, that have also been logging
>>>> ISP information.
>>>>
>>>> Anybody want to bet they are not correloating it?
>>>>
>>>> Google may be out to do 'good', but it's THEIR vision og good.
>>>>
>>>> YMMV,
>>>>
>>>> -John
>>>>
>>>> ============
>>>>>
>>>>> Roy
>>>>>
>>>>> Roy Morgan
>>>>> k1lky at earthlink.net
>>>>> K1LKY Since 1958 - Keep 'em Glowing!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> Milsurplus mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>>>>
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list