[Milsurplus] Doubting the Foxhole Radio, conclusions
KD7JYK DM09
kd7jyk at earthlink.net
Fri Aug 3 23:49:21 EDT 2012
No, no, that was the other guy who refered to it as a "coherent receiver".
I know better.
Here we go:
----- Original Message -----
From: <appo2 at juno.com>
To: <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 22:15
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Doubting the Foxhole Radio, conclusions
Well,,original radio communications used spark gap transmitter,,,and so
called coherent detector receiver,,there were no vacuum tubes.coherent
detector
must be shaked if it were dot or dash in cw.But it worked,changed the course
of wars.
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list