[Milsurplus] GO RAX more...
Mike Hanz
aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org
Sat Jun 11 20:28:09 EDT 2011
This whole speculation thread is beginning to disturb me. Time lines of
available equipment (and by inference, equipment platforms, be they
fixed ground or aircraft) are bandied about as if they were all infinite
assets available at the very *beginning* of the war to be drawn upon
whenever needed! The British contribution to the discovery and
classification of German threats seems to be conveniently ignored. The
Brits had both ground based *and* airborne Hallicrafters S-27s by the
hundreds, and I have no doubt it was they who understood the German tank
comms environment long before we got into the mix, and their input
provided important data points for the creation of our ART-6 through
ART-11 jammers. I know it's tempting to throw around all these
*potential* capabilities, but RATs and Admiralty converted BC-455s?
Gimmee a break!
Okay, I'm calm now. A glass of Barboursville Octagon is a wonderful
perspective adjuster. :-) It just seems to me that all sorts of
unusual ideas are being proposed without considering the surveillance
environment, which was a rapidly moving target that, at least in Europe,
had significant Allied involvement. After spending a fair amount of
time in the documents of the era, I gotta say that IMO nothing is as
clear as it might seem just looking at bare equipment specs for
capabilities. There are some great references that discuss this in
detail, like the NDRC Division 15 report after the war, and several of
Alfred Price's books. Some time spent in them reveals a very contorted
picture by month and year of the war. You have to look at the
environment as a whole, not just the U.S. side of it.
No flames meant - it just seemed like something that needed saying...
- Mike
>> When the German paratroopers showed up on the front they were found to
>> be using 28-30 Mc. There was a scramble to obtain receivers that could
>> tune that range.
> That's above the tuning range of the RAT(-1), RAV and RAX but within the
> range of the Admiralty converted BC-455s. Hmmm ... Okay, I'm not going to
> start speculizing. :-)
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list