[Milsurplus] RU, GO, RAX

J. Forster jfor at quik.com
Thu Jun 9 11:16:10 EDT 2011


I believe "stuff" was in short supply in WW II. If you had something
functional, you used it and were (rightly, IMO) low down on the list to
get newer stuff.

FWIW,

-John

============


> There seem to be more photos about of PBY installations with RU receivers,
> or RU + ARB receivers, than
> those with GO + RAX. Is this a datapoint of interest, or just a noise
> artifact?
>
> I think it's interesting that through WW2 you had, apparently, these
> configs
> all existing at the same time,
> and apparently, sometime into the 1950s, altho I will have to ask
> "someone"
> just how late he operated
> the RU+GO.
> -Hue
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>




More information about the Milsurplus mailing list