[Milsurplus] [ARC5] RAT(-1) & RAV: Another Viewpoint.
J. Forster
jfor at quik.com
Wed Jun 8 19:39:20 EDT 2011
Maybe not transmitters? Maybe they were ELINT Rx's for German beam searches?
-John
===============
> Many years ago I had a stroke of miraculous luck
> and spoke with a Navy vet
> who had experiance with this issue.
> I won't go into detail about this interview
> because the last time I did,
> I got some very nasty public remarks for my trouble.
> He said that, in the 1938-39-40 time frame,
> the Brits had a need for aircraft receivers
> (and it would be supposed, transmitters,
> though he didn't say that) which would cover
> the upper end of the HF band.
> They had receivers for that band
> but they were big and heavy.
> The A.R.C. rigs were supposed to supply that need.
> I'm certain no one will ever find any documentation.
> One vet's testimony- make of it what you will.
> I won't debate the matter other than to say
> I knew the man and I believe every word he said.
> 73 D.S.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list