[Milsurplus] Economic realities and modification
Jess Lewis
kr4oj at bellsouth.net
Sun Feb 6 17:37:57 EST 2011
?Agreed....
Most of the articles in the “Evil” CQ Surplus Conversion manuals, were
reprints from 1946~1950, when the average ham was lucky to be making $40~50
per week. The good communications were in the $250 ~500 range, so were well
out of the price range of many, especially the newer & younger budding hams.
Some rigs, in the older ads were selling for xxx dollars, and oh by the way,
if you wanted tubes for that, they were optional extra.
So, a logical solution was to plunk down your $5. Get a brand new, in the
box, surplus rig and get on the air, or hack & experiment to try and make it
do what you wanted. Part of the FUN of being a ham, wasn't it??
Surplus gear isn't something sacred to most people, just as old rusty and
bent up automobiles from the 40 to 60 era isn't either. The museums are full
of pristine "military surplus" rigs, if you are itching to see one. So, what
is the point in "blasting" or looking down your nose at someone who hacked &
had fun in doing it.
Jess KR4OJ
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list