[Milsurplus] Military radio on the railroad

[Glenn Little WB4UIV]

I have to agree that the patch panel placement is not ideal.
Possible the equipment under the patch cords, looks to be a SSB 
converter and R390A, are for backup, on a fixed, or not often moved 
in frequency.
If I would have designed it, I would have used shorter patch cables 
and moved the patch panel further up the rack.

73
Glenn
WB4UIV




At 05:58 PM 8/20/2011, jcoward5452 at aol.com wrote:






>Cool Pix. Seems odd though, to have the patch panel cords 
>overhanging the gear on the right.
>  Jay
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nick England <navy.radio at gmail.com>
>To: Military Surplus Mail List <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Sat, Aug 20, 2011 1:21 pm
>Subject: [Milsurplus] Military radio on the railroad
>
>
>Presidential train communications car
>ttp://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKWHP-ST-54-43-61.aspx
>Google "Presidential train communications car" for more
>cheers,
>ick
>_____________________________________________________________
>ilsurplus mailing list
>ome: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>elp: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>ost: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>lease help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>______________________________________________________________
>Milsurplus mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html