[Milsurplus] solar power
Ralph Cameron
ramcam at magma.ca
Mon Oct 4 17:52:31 EDT 2010
On 10/4/2010 2:41 PM, Peter Gottlieb wrote:
> What is the financial harm caused? What is the monetary value of this
> "community well?" RFI, and just about all regulations businesses
> complain bitterly about, are an effort to assign a value to what would
> be an economic externality. Who's to say that the FCC is wrong to
> "subsidize" a ham operator at the expense of the neighbor?
>
> Just raising some points. Solar inverters are mouse nuts, BPL is the
> 800 pound gorilla.
>
>
> Oct 4, 2010 02:01:23 PM, jfor at quik.com <mailto:jfor at quik.com> wrote:
>
> >Because it's a bad idea to piss into the community well?
> >
> >-John
> >
> >===========
> >
> >
> >> Pter Gottlieb has a point. Why subsidize a hobby?
> >>
> >> Why should the commercial designers be permitted to design a
> product
> >> that disrupts the spectrum anyway. They always claim it raises
> the cost.
> >> The spectrum is a finite resource like and we the consumer pays for
> >> protecting it in many ways- moreso today. There are ethics in
> protecting
> >> the public and lawyers thrive on the lack of ethics in
> industry. I\ve
> >> worked on resolving RFI issues for 35 years and you\d be amazed
> at the
> >> excuses I hear.
> >>
> >> Ralph Cameron
> >> VE3BBM
> >> ______________________________________________________________
> >> Milsurplus mailing list
> >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> >>
> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >______________________________________________________________
> >Milsurplus mailing list
> >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> >
> >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >That\s the point Peter, most of this stuff is built off shore so
> you get what you specify. FCC aren't protecting the hams, they
> should be protecting the other spectrum users Responsible
> spectrum sharing means producing devices that don't cause harmful
> interference.
>
Ralph Cameron
VE3BBM
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list