[Milsurplus] solar panels

[Peter Gottlieb]

  I see this as another in a series of sell-outs to commercial interests that 
began with allowing BPL.

Perhaps we should look at it another way though.  You support capitalism, don't 
you?  Why should a bunch of hobbyists drive up the costs (and reduce the 
profits) of a new industry (solar inverters)?  Wouldn't that be a form of tax?  
Wouldn't that cause them to hire fewer workers?  You would impose regulations on 
RFI?  You mean like the socialists over in Europe?  Why should the general 
population have to subsidize the hobby of a very few?



On 10/3/2010 11:01 PM, WA5CAB at cs.com wrote:
> The crew that's in there now are lawyers, typical IQ in the low 70's.  If
> someone mentioned RFI to them they'd think he was dislectic and meant RIF.
>
> In a message dated 10/3/2010 8:21:02 PM Central Daylight Time,
> arc5 at ix.netcom.com writes:
>>> Another rarely mentioned aspect of some systems is RFI.
>>> I know of one ham in CA who can no longer operate
>>> 75 or 40 Meters since his neighbor installed a big solar system.
>> I don't know about the crew that's in there now,
>> but during Reily's time, the FCC would have taken
>> some action on that if the neighbor didn't fix it.
>>
> Robert&  Susan Downs - Houston
> wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
> MVPA 9480
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.856 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3174 - Release Date: 10/03/10 02:34:00
>