[Milsurplus] Coax (72/75 Ohm twinax) for sale
D C *Mac* Macdonald
k2gkk at hotmail.com
Wed Oct 14 22:39:01 EDT 2009
I would respectvely suggest that 75 Ohm transmitting
twinlead (if even still available) would be a far better
feedline. I don't have tables immediately available, but
am pretty certain that the twinax cable would surely
be considerably more lossy than the 75 Ohm twinlead,
especially under VSWR conditions much removed from flat.
My suggestion would be to use a 1:1 balun from 50 Ohm
coax to the 72 Ohm twinax and tie the twinax shield to
the common ground post of the balun.
It seems a bit of overkill to me unless there is a specific
reason for using shielded feedline.
73 - Mac, K2GKK/5
(Since 30 Nov 53)
Oklahoma City, OK
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:26:48 -0400
> From: whitaker at pa.net
> To: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Coax for sale
>
> de WB2CPN
> Ground the shield at the transmitter.
> Twisted pair coax is also common in
> studio video circuits.
> 73 Clete
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list