[Milsurplus] FT: ART-13

[wf2u at ws19ops.com]

Mark,

The transmitter you'd want to run with the BC-342 is the BC-191.
There were a few SCR-* configurations with the two. There was of  
course the BC-312/BC-191. The only difference between the BC-342 and  
the BC-312 is the label and the AC supply instead of the dynamotor.  
You take a '312, pop out the dynamotor, pop in the AC supply and you  
get a BC-342 with the BC-312 label and vice versa.
The BC-191 transmitter also had a number of AC supplies which could be  
used in a fixed location, instead of the 24 V dynamotor. The BC-342  
would have been used in that case.
If you like the ART-13, but you don't want it because the incorrect  
receiver for it, how about trying to trade the BC-342 for a BC-348 for  
the correct receiver (or rather one of the correct receivers) for the  
ART-13?

My 2 cents - other opinions may vary...

73, Meir WF2U
Landrum, SC


Quoting Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb at gmail.com>:

> Folks --
>
> As mentioned in a prior post,  I've acquired a BC-342-N.   I'd like to
> get a military transmitter to run with it.  I know the BC-610 was the
> mate for the 342, but that's out of my price range,  so I'm open for
> ideas on a trade,  plus or minus some cash etc.
>
> I have a pair of ART-13's on the pile for restoration,  and I don't
> need both of them.   The ART-13 up for trade can be viewed at
> http://www.k3msb.com/art13/art13.html -- the dynamotor is NOT
> included.
>
> Shipping -- I'd prefer not to -- but I'm willing to consider.   Email
> me off line if interested.
>
> 73 Mark K3MSB
> York PA.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>