[Milsurplus] PBY radios
w4thq at cox.net
w4thq at cox.net
Sun Nov 2 17:39:32 EST 2008
I would say to Hue's question that most of these situations are essentially time-related. In other words, GF/RU equipment were early technology followed by ATA/ARC-5, then phasing in of the ARB, and later by ATC/BC-348. Meanwhile, selected VHF installations came in for command communications in parallel with channalized liaison equipment. Use of ZB homing converters almost always required compatible RU or ARB receivers. From what I have read or seen, most equipment was used far beyond what seems sensible. For example, a flying club near Huntsville bought an SNJ in the early '60's which still had and ATA 3-4 Mc transmitter with a companion receiver along with an R23/ARC-5. Anything seems likely depending on whether the aircraft was rear area or combat type equipment.
John W4THQ
---- Hue Miller <kargo_cult at msn.com> wrote:
> I wonder what the criteria were for which particular
> installation was used, GO + 2 RU, GO + ARB + RU,
> or BC-348 + ART-13. Also in the first 2 of these, was
> the ATB always included, or only with the ARB ? Was
> the ATB deleted and replaced by ATA/ ARC-5 in the
> latter installation? -Hue Miller K7HUE
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list