[Milsurplus] "Sick" R390/URR
WA5CAB at cs.com
WA5CAB at cs.com
Sun Mar 23 23:39:10 EST 2008
Sorry, obviously a false memory from 30+ years ago hetorodyned with one from
the R-388 or some such. The coil racks in the R-390 are checked and set at 02
000. But the consequences of setting them at 08 999+ are exactly as I
previously described.
In a message dated 3/23/2008 9:31:32 PM Central Standard Time,
jupete at bigpond.net.au writes:
> John… The R-390 has its synchronization checked at 02 000 freq.
> indicator. The index holes are on the REAR of the RFmodule and can only be
> effectively seen with the aid of a dental mirror or some such.--- much clearer if you
> take out the Xtal oscillator module too.
>
> The index holes on the cams should bisect the marking line on the RF module
> at that frequency setting ,
>
> Cheers
>
> Pete
>
>
>
> Pete D.Williams
> jupete at bigpond.net.au
> METUNG 3904 AUSTRALIA
>
>
>
> From: milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of WA5CAB at cs.com
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 1:52 PM
> To: k5pgw at yahoo.com; milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] "Sick" R390/URR
>
>
>
>
> John,
>
> The first thing that you should always check in the R-390 and R-390A is the
> mechanical alignment of the coil tuning racks. And especially in the
> relatively rare R-390. To mechanically align an R-390A, you set the band switch to
> 4-8 MC and turn the tuning up to 7999+. And all of the alignment marks on
> all of the cams should match up. The R-390 isn't done this way. You do each
> slug rack on its own band setting. If you do the 390 the way you do a 390A,
> you get a receiver with a few hot spots, mostly deaf and partially dead. The
> reason I know this is that during an ocean vacation cruise in 1967 and 1968 I
> was for a thankfully short period responsible for the care and feeding of
> about 92 R-390A's. A few years after I came home, I acquired an R-390 and the
> first thing I did was the mechanical alignment since everything was "way out
> of adjustment". Then I read the TM which I had also acquired and discovered
> that the similarity between the two receivers is mostly only skin deep.
>
>
>
>
Robert & Susan Downs - Houston
<http://www.wa5cab.com> (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
<wa5cab at cs.com> (Primary email)
<wa5cab at comcast.net> (Backup email)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20080324/7b139a04/attachment.htm
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list