[Milsurplus] "Sick" R390/URR

WA5CAB at cs.com WA5CAB at cs.com
Sun Mar 23 23:39:10 EST 2008


Sorry, obviously a false memory from 30+ years ago hetorodyned with one from 
the R-388 or some such.  The coil racks in the R-390 are checked and set at 02 
000.  But the consequences of setting them at 08 999+ are exactly as I 
previously described.

In a message dated 3/23/2008 9:31:32 PM Central Standard Time, 
jupete at bigpond.net.au writes: 
> John…  The R-390 has its  synchronization checked at 02 000 freq. 
> indicator. The index holes  are on the REAR of the RFmodule and can only be 
> effectively seen with the  aid of a dental mirror or some such.--- much clearer if you 
> take out the Xtal oscillator module too.
> 
>  The index holes on the cams should bisect the marking line on the RF module 
>  at that frequency setting ,
> 
>  Cheers 
> 
> Pete
> 
>   
> 
>   Pete D.Williams
> jupete at bigpond.net.au
> METUNG 3904 AUSTRALIA
> 
> 
> 
> From: milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of WA5CAB at cs.com
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 1:52 PM
> To: k5pgw at yahoo.com; milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] "Sick" R390/URR
> 
>  
>  
> 
>  John,
> 
> The first thing that you should always check in the R-390 and R-390A is the 
> mechanical alignment of the coil tuning racks.  And especially in the 
> relatively rare R-390.  To mechanically align an R-390A, you set the band switch to 
> 4-8 MC and turn the tuning up to 7999+.  And all of the alignment marks on 
> all of the cams should match up.  The R-390 isn't done this way.  You do each 
> slug rack on its own band setting.  If you do the 390 the way you do a 390A, 
> you get a receiver with a few hot spots, mostly deaf and partially dead.  The 
> reason I know this is that during an ocean vacation cruise in 1967 and 1968 I 
> was for a thankfully short period responsible for the care and feeding of 
> about 92 R-390A's.  A few years after I came home, I acquired an R-390 and the 
> first thing I did was the mechanical alignment since everything was "way out 
> of adjustment".  Then I read the TM which I had also acquired and discovered 
> that the similarity between the two receivers is mostly only skin deep.
> 
> 
> 
> 

Robert & Susan Downs - Houston
<http://www.wa5cab.com> (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
<wa5cab at cs.com> (Primary email)
<wa5cab at comcast.net> (Backup email)
   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20080324/7b139a04/attachment.htm


More information about the Milsurplus mailing list