[Milsurplus] Re: differences between BC-191F & N
W7QHO at aol.com
W7QHO at aol.com
Fri Sep 28 13:11:13 EDT 2007
In a message dated 9/28/07 7:50:15 AM, cosmoline at aa4rm.ba-watch.org writes:
> Now comes a current puzzle & that's whether '375 cousin used on MCW rather
> than (i)CW. Now know '375 liasson only used in sqdn. lead bomber.
> '375 too chirpy to ever work with a '348 on xtal filter so think MCW.
> May have answer tonite.
>
> Note I visited W2CQH yesterday where a '375 runs every morning on 3725.
> Uses BC-696 as VFO since too much FM from MO
>
>
Marty, et-al
Provided that the keying relay contact sequencing is correctly set, BC-375
chirp is primarily a function of power supply regulation. When running off a
dynamotor the chirp is minimal on 75 and 160M and I don't believe receiving on
a BC-348 with the xtal filter on would be/have been a problem. Of course, we
don't know what kind of receivers might have been used back at the receiving
base end.
On 375 FMing, this can be virtually eliminated by over-neutralizing slightly
as I have described several times on this forum.
Dennis D. W7QHO
Glendale, CA
**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20070928/ea26f160/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list