[Milsurplus] Detailed BC-348 Article
Mike Hanz
AAF-Radio-1 at aafradio.org
Mon Sep 3 21:46:51 EDT 2007
Hue Miller wrote:
>Mike, why do you suppose Spain went to the JU-52?
>Was the USA still miffed at Spain over the pro-Axis stance
>in WW2, preventing acquisition of US war-surplus?
>
Not sure, but I think it had more to do with the fact that JU-52s saw
extensive service as both transport and "bombers" during the Spanish
civil war, and Franco was impressed with everything German - even long
after the war. To be fair, the JU-52 was an amazing workhorse, able to
land on very short unimproved fields and carry an impressive load -
compared with the DC-3, for example.
>I wonder if the engineers brought the drawings with them,
>or if it was a total reverse-engineer.
>
I suspect the drawings came with them, Hue. Everything down to the
wooden mast is identical with wartime German JU-52s. Only the "B-17
additions" compromise an otherwise perfect copy, based on my discussions
with other NASM folks.
>I also wonder why Spain needed a paratroop force, but
>i'll leave that to them.
>
>
Can't comment on the motivation, but the aircraft was quickly
convertible to a variety of uses, and I'm sure simple cargo hauling was
high on the list. The one at Hazy is set up for paratroops, and has a
number of very nice features that highly recommend it to that task.
Perhaps the 1940 German newsreels were still in Franco's mind? :-)
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list