[Milsurplus] X-Ray Damage.. more

[John Franke]

Does the Post Office still use electron beam irradiation?  See: 
http://www.designnews.com/article/CA198792.html

John  WA4WDL

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "john p hutchins" <olegerityincj at austin.rr.com>
To: "J Forster" <jfor at quik.com>
Cc: <armyradios at yahoogroups.com>; <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] X-Ray Damage.. more


>J -
> I would like to see the picture it must have been toasted.
>
> Hutch
> J Forster wrote:
>
>>I was sent a pic of a damaged crystal elements that originated this
>>thread and it looks far to severe for something incidental to an X-Ray.
>>It looks like there was an arc inside the case, so it seems possible
>>that someone along the shipping is exposing the packages to an EMP.  The
>>reasons for such exposure are obvious and likely justified by some
>>'homeland security' cover.
>>
>>If such is the case, it may have more impact on the international trade
>>in electronic items by individuals that the elimination of surface
>>shipping last spring.
>>
>>I'd be interested to hear of other examples
>>
>>Best,
>>-John
>>
>>______________________________________________________________
>>Milsurplus mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>