[Milsurplus] Re: [Repeater-Builder] ARRL Aiding Effort to
MitigateRepeater Interference to Military Radars
jmfranke
jmfranke at cox.net
Fri Apr 20 15:59:38 EDT 2007
There might still be a few SPS-40 shipborne radars out there that also
operate in the 70cm band.
John WA4WDL, former aircrew on E-2B Hawkeye and E-1B Tracer (Willy Fudd)
aircraft.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dick" <rertman at ix.netcom.com>
To: "Michael Vicari" <michael.vicari at verizon.net>; "MILSURPLUS"
<milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>; "Larry Tighe" <larryradio at worldnet.att.net>;
"Al AF6P Pantalone" <al at af6p.com>; "Louis OFFICE Strohacker"
<louis.strohacker at L-3com.com>; "R. Dale KB7UB Piedfort" <kb7ub-5 at dxer.com>;
"Harlan OFFICE Hicken" <hghicken at rockwellcollins.com>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 3:35 PM
Subject: [Milsurplus] Re: [Repeater-Builder] ARRL Aiding Effort to
MitigateRepeater Interference to Military Radars
> Only in a few geographical places. I believe there are only two PAVE PAWS
> radars operating now, so the Beale AFB, CA, and Otis AFB sites are the
> only ones that might suffer 70 cm interference from amateur repeaters.
> From what I hear, PAVE PAWS is being decommissioned one site at a time (I
> sure would like to have one of their antennas for 70 cm SSB ops at my
> QTH).
>
> The Navy still has radars in that band. The AN/APS-138 series on the E-2C
> Hawkeye AWACS airplane is one of them.
>
> 73,
>
> Dick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Vicari" <michael.vicari at verizon.net>
> To: "Dick" <rertman at ix.netcom.com>;Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] ARRL
> Aiding Effort to Mitigate Repeater Interference to Military Radars
>
>
>> As secondary users, we might bite the big one.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dick" <rertman at ix.netcom.com>
>> To: "MILSURPLUS" <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>; "Larry Tighe"
>> <larryradio at worldnet.att.net>; "Al AF6P Pantalone" <al at af6p.com>; "Louis
>> OFFICE Strohacker" <louis.strohacker at L-3com.com>; "Mike Vicari"
>> <michael.vicari at verizon.net>; "R. Dale KB7UB Piedfort"
>> <kb7ub-5 at dxer.com>; "Harlan OFFICE Hicken" <hghicken at rockwellcollins.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:56 PM
>> Subject: Fw: [Repeater-Builder] ARRL Aiding Effort to Mitigate Repeater
>> Interference to Military Radars
>>
>>
>>> FYI:
>>>
>>> Dick W1NMZ
>>> =======================================================
>>> ARRL Aiding Effort to Mitigate Repeater Interference to Military Radars
>>>
>>> A PAVE PAWS radar facility. [US Air Force Photo]
>>>
>>> NEWINGTON, CT, Apr 17, 2007 -- The ARRL has been working with the US
>>> Department of Defense to develop a plan to mitigate alleged interference
>>> from 70 cm ham radio repeaters to military radar systems on both coasts.
>>> Amateur Radio is secondary to government users from 420 to 450 MHz and
>>> must not interfere with primary users. Citing an increasing number of
>>> interference complaints, the US Air Force has asked the FCC to order
>>> dozens of repeater systems to either mitigate interference to the "PAVE
>>> PAWS" radars or shut down. The Commission has not yet responded. The
>>> situation affects 15 repeaters within less than 100 miles of Otis Air
>>> Force Base on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and more than 100 repeaters
>>> within some 140 miles of Beale Air Force Base near Sacramento,
>>> California. ARRL Regulatory Information Specialist Dan Henderson, N1ND,
>>> stresses that the Defense Department acknowledges Amateur Radio's value
>>> in disasters and emergencies and is being extremely cooperative -- and a
>>> wholesale shutdown of US 70 cm Amateur Radio activity is not in the
>>> offing.
>>>
>>> "The ARRL Lab is working up calculations on each repeater system the Air
>>> Force has identified to determine where interference-mitigation
>>> techniques offer a reasonable chance of keeping the repeater on the
>>> air," Henderson says. "In order for the amateur community as a whole to
>>> succeed in this venture, it is going to require the cooperation of all
>>> affected repeater owners."
>>>
>>> A US Air Force contractor identified the problematic repeater systems
>>> last summer, but the situation didn't become critical until the Air
>>> Force contacted the FCC a month ago. ARRL officials met with Defense
>>> Department representatives in late March to discuss alleged interference
>>> to the PAVE PAWS radar sites, and this week Henderson contacted Amateur
>>> Radio frequency coordinating organizations in both affected areas -- the
>>> Northern Amateur Relay Council of California (NARCC) and the New England
>>> Spectrum Management Council (NESMC).
>>> PAVE PAWS is a missile and satellite detection and tracking system, and
>>> its name is a half-acronym. "PAVE" is simply an Air Force program name.
>>> "PAWS" stands for "Phased Array Warning System." Although PAVE PAWS has
>>> been in existence since the late 1970s, the Cape Cod and Sacramento
>>> sites are the only remaining operational facilities in the US.
>>>
>>> PAVE PAWS facilities occupy essentially the entire 70 cm band -- one
>>> factor that makes mitigation difficult. Feeding upward of 1800 active
>>> antenna elements, the broadband radar transmitters emit an average power
>>> output of more than 145 kW.
>>>
>>> As a "first step" to mitigate the interference, the ARRL is recommending
>>> that all affected repeater owners reduce power -- possibly to as little
>>> as 5 W effective radiated power (ERP). "We understand the difficulty
>>> this may cause to owners and users," Henderson said, "but the
>>> alternative to operating with a smaller coverage area may be not
>>> operating at all." Amateur Radio stations already must abide by a
>>> maximum 50 W PEP power limitation in the areas around both Air Force
>>> facilities.
>>>
>>> Henderson says the League is still seeking further information on the
>>> problem. "Until the Defense Department accepts a mitigation plan,
>>> repeater owners should exercise patience," he cautioned. "Once the ARRL
>>> Lab has completed its propagation calculations, we will be in a better
>>> position to provide advice for specific repeaters on a case-by-case
>>> basis."
>>>
>>> Contact Dan Henderson, N1ND (860-594-0236), with specific questions or
>>> issues associated with this situation.
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list