[Milsurplus] Updated Aircraft Receiver??
D C *Mac* Macdonald
k2gkk at hotmail.com
Tue Oct 3 20:41:43 EDT 2006
Methinks I need to pay a visit to the seller to inspect the receiver.
Mac - K2GKK/5
Oklahoma City
----Original Message Follows----
From: <scottjohnson1 at cox.net>
To: arc5 at ix.netcom.com, gl4d21a at juno.com,D C *Mac* Macdonald
<k2gkk at hotmail.com>
CC: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Updated Aircraft Receiver??
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:20:19 -0700
Before the tan color, they used a greyish olive wrinkle.
This was used until the early sixties. I have an RV-11
that has a FAA contract that is still this green color,
the color change does roughly coincide with the CAA
to FAA change.
Scott
---- D C *Mac* Macdonald <k2gkk at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I sort of doubt that it was FAA. FAA stuff had
> a rather peculiar pinkish tan color. I don't know
> why that color was chosen. Our radio shop here
> at the depot overhaul shop stopped service on
> the last of the radio equipment painted that
> way late in 2005.
>
> Mac - K2GKK/5
>
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "gl4d21a at juno.com" <gl4d21a at juno.com>
> To: arc5 at ix.netcom.com
> CC: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Updated Aircraft Receiver??
> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:22:00 GMT
>
> I looked at his other offerings. Looks like he found an old control
> tower which was abandoned about 1950. Mac, or anyone know how to
> read CAA contract dates? Or maybe FAA Ok City is cleaning out the
> really deep basement?
>
> 73,
> George
> W5VPQ
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list