[Milsurplus] Re: Bad rap for BAMA

[Todd, KA1KAQ]

On 3/21/06, Ed Zeranski <ezeran at ezeran.cnc.net> wrote:
> Subject: [Milsurplus] Re: Bad rap for BAMA
>
>
> Someone reported BAMA schemat.s $u at k and they'd never been able to read
> one.
>
>         I've downloaded good stuff from them and some sort of iffy. My take on it
> is BAMA is a sterling service but it is dependant on who up loads the info.

I agree completely. You have to start with something good to end up
with something good. Same experiences, along with a few for the .djvu
format. Some great stuff, some questionable, but a whole lot better
off than I'd be if no one was offering this help to us.

Maybe the answer is for the community to update the more questionable
versions with better scans? Technology has improved quite a bit since
Ken started doing this, many moon ago.

de Todd/'Boomer'  KA1KAQ