[Milsurplus] Navigation System
Unserviceable but Repairable
cosmoline at aa4rm.ba-watch.org
Mon Mar 20 19:45:40 EST 2006
Puzzle, puzzle, puzzle
Yo Mike et. al.
This goes on & on about the ARN-7's dad the SCR-269 & how it compared
w. other DF sets around 1943.
You kindly sent me an excerp of the BC-431 manual & it shows that
the BC-433/SCR-269 is same with 2050 thyratron loop/servo-drivers added to
make it an adf... rather than a manual 'unilateral' (one null) df like the
bc-431 or navy DZ (neat - ed)
What confounds me is that if the one-null manual '431 & automatic '433
were built by Bendix per legend, why'd the MN-26 manual two-null df
soldier-on thru the war. And go on 'til the manual one-null MN-31
happened later.
Or were the MN-26 & MN-31 concurrent? And was the BC-433 aka SCR-269
adf really a Bendix thing at all.
And if the "lady b gud" B24 had a '269 or even a one-null manual
'431 aboard, how cud they have $#@&ed up? (have 1943 B-24 consist that
sez SCR-269 installed)
Legend is they overflew base. Might that B24 have had a MN-26??
If it was some jurrasic two-null thing a "turn & watch null precession"
would have eliminated ambiguity. Lady B discoverers sed navigator's desk
covered w. comics perhaps indicative that flight-deck didn't confide in
navigator. Have never seen that theorized.
signed
the mf question man
(mf -> medium freq. of course)
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list