[Milsurplus] ADF vs. HFDF
Mike Morrow
kk5f at earthlink.net
Fri Mar 17 11:46:52 EST 2006
Richard wrote:
>The navy and army undoubtedly had HFDF (high-frequency direction
>finding) stations from the 1930's on, but they were manual.
>The U-Boat transmissions using Kurier-Signal were very short, 337
>milliseconds maximum, and manual DF'ing wouldn't have a ghost of a
>chance of finding them. Huff-Duff was direction finding using two
>antennas to two receivers feeding a scope to give an instantaneous
>vector, and would indeed catch the Kurier transmissions. The idea was
>first developed in 1926 by R. A. Watson-Watt to localize thunderstorms,
>but apparently wasn't used by the military until late in WWII, and named
>Huff-Duff.
>
>Referenz: "Funkpeilung als alliierte Waffe gegen deutsche U-Boote
>1939-1945." Arthur O. Bauer, 1997 (in German)
There are excerpts (mostly in German) from this interesting book at:
http://cdv-and-t.org/
There is a link to a 23 page article on the technical details of the HF-DF systems used by the British (FH3 and FH4 sets) that takes you to:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~aobauer/HFDF1998.pdf
If you poke around a bit on the HF-DF topics, you'll even find a picture of the FH4 HFDF set.
As Richard points out, there is very little that aircraft LF/MF ADF sets had in common with shipboard rapid-response HF-DF technology. The HF-DF system was far far more sophisticated.
73,
Mike / KK5F
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list