[Milsurplus] HFDF against U Boats
boeing377 at aol.com
boeing377 at aol.com
Fri Mar 17 01:46:18 EST 2006
My late father in law ran a Navy DF station in Brazil during WW 2. He
told me that they were responsible for locating several U boats that
were sunk using info they provided. Their sole mission was to take
bearings on suspected enemy radio transmissions. He said that signals
were generally weak, nulls were broad, but when cross plotted with
bearings from other DF stations you could often narrow the location
down to a searchable area.
<<Ten years ago, Kathleen Williams wrote a book: "Secret Weapon: U.S.
High-Frequency Direction Finding in the Battle of the Atlantic" which
addresses
the use of "Huff Duff" against the U-Boats during the Atlantic
Campaign. I have
finally gotten around to reading it, and it has raised some questions.
She
apparently relied almost exclusively on Navy, British, German and IT&T
sources,
and missed AAF, Sperry and Bendix. The book starts with a brief
discussion of
land based HFDF, the British contributions, and then describes the
development
of shipboard HFDF, which, apparently German Admiral Karl Dönitz and his
staff
thought to not be possible with contemporary technology. She dismisses
high
frequency direction finding from aircraft as being impractical in WW2.
I wonder what Bendix thinks about that? I suspect this immediately
becomes a
matter of semantics, navigation DF vs. SIGINT DF. But, it raises the
interesting (to me, at least) question of whether the (A)DF steerable
loop
system could be effective at all against the high speed CW of the
U-Boats. And
whether any effort was made to adapt the ADF to such a search? I know
that the
Bendix and AN/xxx systems were used in the bombers for navigation, but
has
anyone ever heard of using one to track submarines?
One other aspect of this book is worth noting. She describes the
almost
immovable Navy bureaucracy against adopting anything modern or
technical. It
took a while for the actuality of worldwide war to sink in. Sort of
makes one
wonder whose side those desk bound admirals were on.
73,
George
W5VPQ>>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list