[Milsurplus] Re: [ARC5] SCR-274N Makes It on ARRL.ORG

[W7QHO at aol.com]

In a message dated 6/20/06 11:58:45 AM, kk5f at earthlink.net writes:


> There can be no justification for hacking up something like a BC-699 (of 
> marginal ham utility under the best of conditions, even 60 years ago) just to 
> get it on the air.  I though most boatanchor types had moved beyond that, but 
> that article proves how wrong I was.
> 

Guess no one should have ever sporterized a Springfield either.......

Dennis D. W7QHO
Glendale, CA