[Milsurplus] Comparison of Navy vs Army Air Corps equipment
Hue Miller
kargo_cult at msn.com
Sun Jul 2 21:20:28 EDT 2006
I have always felt the TCS receiver was the weak spot of a T/R set which otherwise
would have been extremely attractive to post-war hams. The transmitter, on the other
hand, is a jem, and with little work and a PS, you had a poor-man's Ranger. The
receiver weak point is the bandspread, and for me, the lack of any dial escutcheon,
or lighting. There's only a metal disk, unlighted, behind a cutout in the front panel,
pretty basic. Of course, as with all other mil tactical sets, the use was pre-determined
channelized, not intended for weekend use looking for novice signals in a crowded band.
I have thought that if one was gung-ho on the dial, one could fabricate a new tuning
disk from clear plastic, number it, and have a pilot lamp mounted behind it. But unless
you limit the tunng range, the bandspread is still terrible. The selectivity certainly is not
inferior to any of the 3-6 or 6-9 Command Set receivers. Consider that the 3-6 Command
set, the IF is somewhere like 1/2 of the lowest working frequency, while the TCS is
around 455 kHz. When i used a TCS receiver on the bands, i coupled a Heathkit Q-mult
into it, and that worked just fine. Oh- also re the selectivity - there were some TCS
receivers, not many i think, that were intended for land vehilcle use and were therefore
built for wider selectivity. The RBD receiver has approximately similar physical
architecture and roughly equivalent usage and with a much nicer dial assembly
but still you're stuck with the 1.5-3, 3-6, 6-12 tuning, plus the IF i think is 915 kHz.
I think the reasons you didn't see that many TCS setups in hamshacks compared to
Command Sets, was for one thing, as another person posted, there weren't that many
built, also that the Navy hung onto some as long as possible (last new ones i saw
given to MARS members was Dec. 1976, when HF AM was no longer permitted for
marine use - otherwise the Navy would still have some in stock, i'm sure. ) Also the
prices pretty much held up - maybe there were still some commercial or military users
overseas who still bought them - compared to real bargain prices on the Command Sets.
-Hue Miller
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list