[Milsurplus] Electric Radio - February 2006
w8au at sssnet.com
w8au at sssnet.com
Mon Feb 20 19:07:44 EST 2006
At 06:50 PM 2/20/06, Mike Morrow wrote:
>7050 kc is not a standard BC-611 frequency, is this a mistake? What would
>be the point of requiring these units to operate on
>7050 kc?
Enemy monitors may not have been accustomed to listening there??
>Text on page 44 and a picture of a six foot tall HF transmitter on page 45
>is labeled as a US Navy "TBY." I would have expected Electric Radio folks
>to know that couldn't possibly be correct.
Yep... that one stood out like a "sore thumb!" Spent many minutes
examining it to determine if it was a TBK or similar... no conclusions.
>ER hasn't been covering the old military gear the past few years nearly as
>well or as often as they were doing ten years ago.
Any editorial review?? Seems 73 magazine used to print articles w/o
checking and always received feedback on bum info contained therein.
RIP....73 mag....
Perry w8au
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list