[Milsurplus] Think MAB, DAV and DAV-1

[William Donzelli]

> > But a wrong answer, I'm afraid.  I suspect the the MAB post-dates
> the BC-611, which makes one wonder why a set like the MAB/DAV would
> see the light of day when something much less awkward and higher
> performing like the BC-611 was available.

I think MAB was derived from an earlier set(s) - MU, MT, MW, strikes a
bell. I do not have much info on these, but a test set I once saw had a
pre-war contract date (1940 or so, I think).

WIlliam Donzelli
aw288 at osfn.org