[Milsurplus] Dynaverters
Bob Camp
ham at cq.nu
Sat Mar 26 23:09:16 EST 2005
Hi
Given what they had to do it's kind of amazing that the transistor
power supplies worked as well as they did. Charging the high voltage
capacitors pulled a pretty good surge. They generally had a simple
feedback arrangement to keep them oscillating. This made the reliable
(low parts count) but prone to odd failure modes.
Replacing the transistors (Ge to Si or Si to Ge) was a fairly common
thing to try and more or less here's what usually happened:
1) The bias was off and the transistors were full on (germanium parts
in a silicon circuit). The oscillator didn't kick in and you simply had
a lot of DC through one of the transistors and one side of the
transformer.
2) The bias was off and the transistors were full off (Si in Ge). Not
exactly a disaster. This assumes fixed bias, which often was not the
case.
So you hear the stories and re-bias the gizmo
3) Germanium wants low VBE but high current (low beta). Silicon wants
high VBE and lower current. Silicon feedback windings fry the germanium
bases on turn off. Silicon parts do not always oscillate properly in
the germanium circuit (not enough voltage).
In go a couple of protection diodes on the bases and maybe fiddle a
capacitor.
4) The silicon parts in the germanium circuit run "faster" than the
germanium's did. Often it would not just be faster and 50/50 duty
cycle, but some odd "burp mode" of oscillation. The transformer does
not like this very much and smokes out. Not an easy thing to diagnose
since it's often load dependent.
Even with the right parts in the supplies these gizmos were not super
reliable. Anything that stopped the self oscillation was likely to
create issues. Cranking the vehicle's engine was a common way to kill
one. If the starter motor kickback spikes didn't do it the low battery
voltage probably would. They *should* keep oscillating down to roughly
half supply with the right transistors in the circuit. With strange
parts, who knows.
So you re-rig the feedback caps and damp out the winding with a few
resistors and maybe a choke or two.
5) At low supply (12 volts) the germanium parts where generally more
efficient than the silicon parts (at least the early ones). The heat
sink may or may not be big enough to get the heat out of them. It's a
race since the silicon parts are rated to higher temperature.
Of course if you put modern design silicon transistors in either of the
old designs then you are going to much faster, much higher gain than
the original designs. Strange oscillation waveforms .....
Take Care
Bob Camp
KB8TQ
On Mar 26, 2005, at 5:17 PM, Hue Miller wrote:
>>> Depending on the era you will either have nice fat germanium power
>>> transistors or later on silicon parts.
>
>>> The transformer feedback
>>> oscillator was pretty similar in both cases, but replacing the
>>> germanium's with silicon parts generally resulted in disaster.
>>> Bob Camp
>
> Why disaster? I could see you might have to change a bias resistor or
> 2,
> but??? -Hue Miller
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list