[Milsurplus] RE: Milsurplus Digest, Vol 14, Issue 53
W1EOF
w1eof at hamnutz.com
Tue Jun 28 04:07:05 EDT 2005
Hi Bob -
I understand that the power unit is capable of handling the two, I was under
the impression that there were two supplies as there would be in the
official installation.
And yes, I'm also sorry that the RAL is not there. While the RAK will be
interesting to play with the RAL would be much more useful to me on the
hambands. I guess I'll have to start a quest to find an RAL as clean as this
RAK!
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
73,
Mark W1EOF
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:13:29 EDT
> From: WA5CAB at cs.com
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Reporting back from radio rescue mission
> To: w1eof at hamnutz.com, milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <154.53c589f9.2ff22869 at cs.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Mark,
>
> Sorry to hear there was no RAL. Can't help you there as all I
> have available
> is a RAK-6.
>
> But your inclusion of the "(1)" in /PS(1)/ prompts me to make
> sure that you
> understand that one RAK/RAL power supply ran two of any
> combination of the
> receivers. Like with the later RBA/RBB/RBC. So if you ever find
> a RAL, you
> already have the power supply for it.
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list