[Milsurplus] 60 Hz.
Richard Brunner
rbrunner at gis.net
Mon Jun 20 06:22:21 EDT 2005
Can anyone say why 60Hz was chosen?
Several reasons:
Machinery construction (motors, transformers) is most economical and
efficient at 50-60 cycles. As the frequency goes up equipment gets smaller
requiring less iron and copper, but much over 60 cycles the iron losses
start increasing unreasonably.
For power transmission the cable reactance becomes significant at higher
frequencies.
50-60 cycles was considered a reasonable compromise for incandescent light
flicker. I have seen lights on a 25 cycle system, and light flicker is very
noticable.
Low frequency (16 2/3, 25 cycles) is advantageous for traction motors, but
when it is rectified to use dc, or a cycloconverter (changing higher
frequency to lower frequency) is used, there is no advantage in low
frequency power. Indeed, new systems use 50-60 cycle power distribution for
traction.
Richard Brunner, AA1P
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list