[Milsurplus] Death of Hobby?

[Chris & Diane]

Packet based communication. Green radios have wider channel bandwidth than a
lot of ham rigs.
And something like a DMDG hopping over a Ebay RF3090 still amaze me as an
80's technology.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hue Miller" <kargo_cult at msn.com>
To: <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Death of Hobby?


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chris Cheng" <hycheng at msn.com>
> To: <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Death of Hobby?
>
>
> > Both the civilian and military communication industry think radio should
be
> > properly defined as voice application in the broadband wireless
internet. I
> > happened to agree with that. The majority of your telephone (wired
> > communication) has gone that way, why not the radio (wireless
communication)
> > ?
> > I am more interest in getting the 802.XX net working or the UWB
experimental
> > radios than working on a QSO card.
>
> Chris, i think most of us here understand the old-style radio
communication  era is gone
> and going. But what puzzles me is what could possibly interest you in the
milsurplus
> list. -Hue Miller
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>