[Milsurplus] BC-348-S

[William Donzelli]

> Well, I don't think so in this case, unless someone dummies up a nameplate.  
> But anyone dummy enough to do that would also probably put it on one of the 
> later receivers, which as most of us know didn't look like the prototype 
> BC-224-A

There probably was a BC-224-T1, however. (and probably a -T2, as I think
GE tried the BC-224 competition).

> Yes, the Signal Corps was a bit sporadic in following its own rules.  Best 
> example I can think of is SCR-211, which should have been IE-something and 
> BC-221 which should have been I-something.

Rules?

William Donzelli
aw288 at osfn.org