[Milsurplus] Oddball question

[Jack Antonio]

Thanks for all the replies.  

It would be interesting to know, 
what poor GI was RA00000001 and
how high did they get before they switched
to SSNs.

If they kept the original system, when they reached
RA99999999, would they have started over again.

My original question was prompted by the serial
number on the cover of a 1945 manual, and whether
or not its presence would be any indication of date of
usage, but it appears the RA system was in use in
WWII and well after, so no clues there.

Again, thanks for all the replies

Jack

Jack Antonio WA7DIA
scr287 at sbcglobal.net



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon at moscow.com>
To: "Jack Antonio" <scr287 at sbcglobal.net>
Cc: <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Oddball question


> Jack Antonio wrote:
> 
> > So the question is, is RA followed by eight
> > digits a valid military serial number? And
> > does RA signify Regular Army, as opposed
> > to a draftee?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> I first joined the National Guard when I was about 17. My 
> serial number, even on active duty was NG-28727210, for the 5 
> years or so I was in the guard.
> 
> When I then was shifted to the Army Reserve, it became RA-
> 28727210.
> 
> Ken W7EKB
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net