[Milsurplus] LF in a B-17?

[Bob Wilder]

Have forwarded this to an ex-8th AF B-17 pilot who may be able to answer.
Bob/AF2HD



At 09:01 PM 8/18/2004 -0400, Mike Hanz wrote:

>Jack Antonio wrote:
>
>>Was LF (200-500) ever used in day to day combat ops in the 8th AF?
>> 
>
>I haven't seen any combat freq allocations in that region /except/ for emergency use over water.  That doesn't mean they don't exist - just that my sample is agonizingly small.
>
>>I was wondering, because, I don't feel the
>>use of trailing wire antennas would be
>>very practical in combat box formations.
>> 
>
>Heh...the mental image of all those aircraft trailing long wires with lead weights is somehow very amusing - like a big jellyfish...  I'm not sure why you would need LF in that situation - lots of folks around you and the command channels to relay problems (if there was time.)
>
>>But then, if LF wasn't used, did the 8th
>>AF heavies have the BC-306, TU-26, and trailing
>>wire antenna system even installed?
>> 
>
>Beyond the basic question, I'm not sure there was a 1:1 ratio between LF transmitter usage and long wire usage, Jack.  The liaison antenna on a B-17 was resonant on the order of 4 MHz, IIRC (- probably don't), but I seem to remember stories about radio ops letting out the trailing wire antenna to better hear HF stations on the way back, when formations were a great deal less organized than when they were going to the target.  
>Also useful when the liaison antenna was damaged.  The mission orders (today's ATO) would have the freqs to be used in emergencies - sometimes they're recorded in the radio logs for a flight in a particular aircraft.  I don't have any for the ETO, just the Pacific, but that's where they reside.
>
>>Or, did they have the LF gear installed, and
>>use it for emergencies on 500KC. Somehow
>>this doesn't sound too practical either.
>> 
>
>I'll admit that if you were over the narrow English Channel it might not be particularly practical, but there were long overwater flights to the north (Iceland, Murmansk, etc.) where communicating with ships might be useful in an emergency.
>
>>I can see that in the Pacific theater, LF would
>>be more useful.
>> 
>
>Yup.  Just slightly more water under you, on the average.
>
>>Just curious
>> 
>
>Hmmm, whatever happened to that cat that expressed the same thought?  :-)
>
>73,
>Mike
>
>______________________________________________________________
>Milsurplus mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 - Release Date: 8/11/2004

Bob & Carole Wilder
6032 Idlemoore Court
Theodore, AL 36582-4117
251-653-5274
http://home.earthlink.net/~bwild
Asst USAF State MARS Director- Alabama
AF2HD/AFA2HD
{Ex W2ZRX/K4FEU/KG1BW/F7CP/W1HJL/W4NVH/W4RHW}

All incoming and outgoing messages are
checked for virus using AVG version 6.0.737
and Virus database 491 updated 08/11/2004