[Milsurplus] Radio designations
[email protected]
[email protected]
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:22:44 EDT
Group,
There are several errors in the Ft. Gordon list that I've spotted and no
doubt others that I haven't. I've pointed a couple out to them but they don't
seem to be interested in corrections so I try to cross-check anything I find
there. TM 11-487 (and 487A) agree with TM 11-233 on SCR-188-A that it was the
BC-342-(*). Although the 12 volt output of the RA-34 would probably also run the
BC-312, the receiver and transmitter weren't necessarily co-located.
SCR-188-A includes Remote Control System RC-47-A for remotely controlling the BC-191.
BTW, RC stands for "Radio Component", not "Remote Control".
In a message dated 4/19/2004 12:06:08 PM Central Daylight Time, [email protected]
writes:
> According to TM 11-487A, the SCR-188A was a BC-191 based ground systems
> intended for use where 115 vac was available. The system included the
> RA-34
> rectifier unit to provide 12 and 1000 vdc for the BC-191. TM 11-487A does
> list
> the 115vac BC-342 as being used in this system. Curiously, the Ft. Gordon
> website (http://www.gordon.army.mil/ocos/museum/) lists the 12 volt BC-312
> instead.
> This may be in error, although the RA-34 would probably have been able to
> run a 312 and 191 together
73
Robert Downs - Houston
<http://www.wa5cab.com> (Web Store)
<[email protected]> (Primary email)
<[email protected]> (Backup email)
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---