[Milsurplus] WTF? Nomenclature style
[email protected]
[email protected]
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:02:18 EDT
Bill & Group,
Minor point. Correct syntax is "?WTF". On voice circuits it was spoken as
"Interrogative Whiskey Tango Foxtrot". :-) Usally with no pro-signs or call
sign.
In a message dated 10/9/2003 10:13:09 PM Central Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
> In all three cases it is clear that the X number and the final number
> could be completely different pieces of equipment.
>
What a revolting development this is. Aside from a couple of TM 11 numbers
that may have been reused, the Signal Corps wasn't generally this sloppy.
> So, Robert, Mike, and the other nomenclature nuts, you have more to think
> about.
>
Hey, Mike. Did you know that there were three of us?
> Also, in the pile I found a blueprint and some official looking docs for
> the PP-278(XA)/ART-13A - a replacement power unit for the dynamotor,
> using 3B28s. I wonder if any were made...
>
Now that would be a find! A guy could probably retire on a hundred of those.
:-)
Which reminds me. I've got a couple of PP-894/GRC-32B ground power supplies
for the AN/ARC-27 (AN/GRC-32) if anyone is interested. One is in the
CY-1191/GRC-32A transit case. Heavy suckers.
73
Robert Downs - Houston
<http://www.wa5cab.com>
<[email protected]>
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---