[Milsurplus] BC 191 info needed
Bob Wilder
[email protected]
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:12:53 -0600
If you do not try to load the 191 beyond about 60-70 watts it is stable
enough for amateur operation. I have used the 191 on 75 meters AM with
good success. On 40 meters it is a little hard to get it to be stable, but
again
it is all a matter of not trying to load it above 60-70 watts. If you try
to push it above 100 watts the oscillator will "pull" and cause FMing on AM
and severe chirp on CW. Many years ago I used on 160 meters AM and it
worked fine. The secret is not to exceed the maximum power of the unit.
At 02:51 PM 12/15/2002 +0000, vk3cz <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hello ,
> Does anyone have any experience using the BC 191 on the air ?
>Is the set stable enough to use in its original design format .
>
>I am trying to put a SCR 193 outfit together , but am missing the BD
>77 dynamotor and plugs etc.
>
>The BC 312 is a nice receiver .
>
>Any input is appreciated
>
>Mike VK3CZ
>
>_______________________________________________
>Milsurplus mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.427 / Virus Database: 240 - Release Date: 12/6/2002
Bob Wilder, AF2HD/AFA2HD
6032 Idlemoore Court
Theodore, AL 36582-4117
251-653-5274
http://home.earthlink.net/~bwild
All incoming and outgoing messages
virus checked with AVG version
6.0.427 Virus database 240 updated
12/6/2002 Get your FREE copy at
http://www.grisoft.com
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
text/plain (text body -- kept)
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---