[MilCom] OT comment.....sorry

[Ken]

Hello Brian:

Well I would say that it all depends on the article.  IF a hobbyist can tie 
it into some actually monitoring and or ask IF anyone has monitored the 
activity referenced (if there's been no log postings) than it would IMHO be 
a very relevant post.

Also I would think that just posting the reference link rather than the 
entire article would save space on the qth net server which would be a good 
idea in the long term.

I haven't seen any rules posted regarding what can & can't be posted to the 
milcom list!  (anything milcom related seems to be on topic!)

Surely, again there's lots of opinions out there on what is right, wrong, or 
for that matter indifferent.
I basically quickly review and discard, so in the end that's probably what 
is easiest & best to do & doesn't get some people all riled up! :) ;)

Ken





----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Sabre59 at aol.com>
To: <milcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:56 AM
Subject: [MilCom] OT comment.....sorry


> Hi,all.....it seems we've been sliding back into the bad habit of using 
> the
> list as a way to pass on news and "military-related" items lately. If I
> remember  correctly, we've already been through this a time or two. Please 
> don't get
> all  bent out of shape, but I'd personally prefer to see the list used for
> it's  intended purpose, and not as a news forum.
>    I fully understand how I have the option to delete  anything I don't 
> care
> to read, but I'd still rather not have my mailbox filled  with all these
> other items.
>  Sorry, guys. Just my two cents worth.
>