[MilCom] 254.2 Again!?

Mon Feb 12 22:17:41 EST 2007

Maybe I have missed something here but I do not recall anybody indicating
what the uplink frequency is for this bird nor indicating that they may have
heard something on that frequency.  I am just barely hearing changes in the
noise level on 254.2 with audio being present but at a very poor SNR here in
Boston.  But my setup is not optimized for it either.

Any ideas?

73's

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: milcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:milcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Dave Holford
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 16:27
To: milcom at mailman.qth.net; rob.berezowski at sasktel.sk.ca
Subject: Re: [MilCom] 254.2 Again!?

As a retired air traffic controller I find this discussion intriguing, and
strange.

I cannot believe that aircraft working Regina ARR/DEP on120.1 would tolerate
hearing traffic working Saskatoon ARR/DEP on 119.9 without filing
complaints. Large numbers of complaints to both their companies and
NavCanada; even Transport Canada. I might even expect these complaints to
show up in CADORS (Canadian Aviation Daily Occurence Reports which contain
all sorts of picayune problems).

A controller may have several radio frequencies each with their own control
module. But only one transmit switch. If two or more frequencies are
selected for simultaneous use then all of them will be transmitting at the
same time. How the system can possibly be configured to allow the
transmission of signals being received on the other frequency would require
some highly unlikely rapid reconfigurations. If the received VHF signals are
to be transmitted on UHF two immediate problems arise -
1. It will be impossible to hear any aircraft transmissions on UHF while an
aircraft on VHF is transmitting - I cannot imagine anyone being prepared to
tolerate such a circumstance. This also would mean that any transmissions
from aircraft on the frequency which is being used to simulcast would not be
recorded - ATC communications are half duplex so you can't listen and talk
at the same time - this would mean that there would be no guaranteed record
of aircraft transmissions; the lawyers would have a field day with such a
situation.
2. When the controller needs to transmit on UHF the system mst be
reconfigured to feed audio from the controller rather than the VHF receiver
to the UHF transmitter.

Basically, if transmissions from one aircraft are simulcast on another
frequency then that second frequency becomes essentially unavailable for
communications from aircraft - the transmitter is in use anytime the
controller or another aircraft uses any of the simulcast frequencies.

As one who has used the system in several military and civil airports over
the last half century, been a listener to the frequencies since the days of
crystallized channel aircraft radios, and taught the technology of modern
ATC communications systems I find this thread very interesting and will be
awaiting enlightenment on what is really happening.

While technically such a situation is not difficult to implement, if it was
actually to occur I would anticipate there would immediately be UCRs
(Unsatisfactory Condition Reports) flooding into the system support centre.

The only time I have heard anything approaching these reports has been a
result of third order intermod at the receiver.

Dave Holford.

----- Original Message -----
From: <rob.berezowski at sasktel.sk.ca>
To: <milcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 3:11 PM
Subject: [MilCom] 254.2 Again!?

> Yes, I hear this all the time here in Regina. It's part of configuration
> ofthe telecom equipment being used by NavCanada. I hear simulcasting all
> the time. For example, when Winnipeg Centre is simulcasting on UHF, both
> the controller audio and the audio from aircraft on the matching VHF
> frequency will be broadcast on UHF. This seems to be normal procedure to
> simulcast the aircraft transmissions.
>
> I've also heard a lot of VHF to VHF simulcasts as well. A good example is
> when the Winnipeg-based controller handling approaches into Regina is
> looking after Saskatoon approaches as well. On the VHF frequency in Regina
> (120.1), I can hear the controller, local aircraft, as well as simulcasts
> of the aircraft approaching Saskatoon (they are on 119.9, but well out of
> direct reception range of my scanner).
>
> So Jody your report doesn't surprise me based on what I normally hear in
> Western Canada.
>
> Rob Berezowski
> Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:33:52 +0000
> From: vampire11 at comcast.net
> Subject: [MilCom] 254.2 Again!?
> To: milcom at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID:
>
>
<021020070133.28727.45CD21000001BB9A000070372207003201CECE0A9D079F030E90 at com
cast.net>
>
>
> Ok just when I thought 254.2 was explained and the mystery was solved,
> This happened. I currently have the that same Calgary Alberta approach
> controller on 254.2 right now, BUT I am hearin the aircraft answer him
> back. The VHF side is gettin in the sat now. I hear the civilian aircraft
> on VHF answering the controller.  I have never heard of a airport
> rebroadcasting all of the VHF side on UHF before. The only thing that is
> usally similucasted is the controller on UHF. Any ideas anyone? I got this
> all recorded as always.
>
> Jody
> North Georgia
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> NOTICE:  This confidential e-mail message is only for the intended
> recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that
> disclosing, copying, distributing, or any other use of this message, is
> strictly prohibited. In such case, please destroy this message and notify
> the sender.
> ______________________________________________________________
> MilCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:MilCom at mailman.qth.net
>

______________________________________________________________
MilCom mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milcom
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
Post: mailto:MilCom at mailman.qth.net