[MilCom] New England Activity 134.10
rob.berezowski at sasktel.sk.ca
rob.berezowski at sasktel.sk.ca
Wed Jun 21 11:52:53 EDT 2006
You're right Al, you can't believe everything in the IFR Supplement. The
same goes for the Canadian IFR Supplement. I've seen cases where the
Canadian IFR Supplement lists VHF ATC (PAR approach, etc.) frequencies for
an Air Force Base. Of course, they're using UHF frequencies exclusively
for ATC at the base, but these VHF PAR frequencies sometimes end up being
used for air to air tactical, and other interesting uses. For example,
134.1 has been used in Canada for air to air tactical, as well as for air
to air refueling.
Rob Berezowski
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:08:17 EDT
From: AllanStern at aol.com
Subject: Re: [MilCom] New England Activity 134.10
To: Milcom at mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: <325.627e2a6.31ca0411 at aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
rfinder1 at verizon.net writes:
>
> Glad I put it in the scanner had a McGuire KC10 talking with Pease Cmd
Post
> earlier this evening regarding the status of one of their KC135's
>
> NIGHTHAWK001
> South Hadley MA
Thanks for posting that, Ken. I am getting a lot of positive messages
from
guys about my statements concerning 134.1, which were challenged here on
Milcom, but some of the guys want to remain anonymous to not ruffle
feathers.
What a world. Maybe now more guys will load up that freq and confirm me.
You
can't believe everything in the IFR Supplement.
AL STERN Satellite Beach FL
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FloridaMilcom/
NOTICE: This confidential e-mail message is only for the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that
disclosing, copying, distributing, or any other use of this message, is
strictly prohibited. In such case, please destroy this message and notify
the sender.
More information about the MilCom
mailing list