From tractorb at ihug.co.nz Sat Dec 3 21:47:25 2016 From: tractorb at ihug.co.nz (Dave Brown) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 15:47:25 +1300 Subject: [Microwave] Cable specs wanted Message-ID: <7596E1D23F254837B01DEDBCE3F86E6C@athlon3200> Looking for the attenuation figures for Andrew FSJ1/50- this is the older cable type, NOT the current type FSJ1/50A. I suspect they are similar but would like to have this confirmed. Particularly interested in attenuation figures for 10 GHz. I can't find any references to cable loss figures in the microwave region for this older cable type anywhere on the internet. (so far!) 73 Dave, ZL3FJ From geraldj at netins.net Sat Dec 3 22:54:09 2016 From: geraldj at netins.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:54:09 -0600 Subject: [Microwave] Cable specs wanted In-Reply-To: <7596E1D23F254837B01DEDBCE3F86E6C@athlon3200> References: <7596E1D23F254837B01DEDBCE3F86E6C@athlon3200> Message-ID: <58439361.2090706@netins.net> I only found one Andrew catalog in my library, number 35 dated from 1991. For FSJ1/50A it says good to 20.4 GHz and loss at 10 GHz is 21.8 dB / 100 feet. LMR240 is a similar size and a length I had measured at MUD 2014 had half the dB loss per 100 feet as good UT-141 at 10 GHz, though the catalog data stops at 6 GHz. The measurement was 1.75 dB loss for 5'10" that would be 30 dB /100 feet. Extrapolating the LMR plotted data shows 27.5 dB / 100 feet at 10 GHz. 73, Jerry, K0CQ On 12/3/2016 8:47 PM, Dave Brown wrote: > Looking for the attenuation figures for Andrew FSJ1/50- this is the > older cable type, NOT the current type FSJ1/50A. I suspect they are > similar but would like to have this confirmed. Particularly interested > in attenuation figures for 10 GHz. I can't find any references to cable > loss figures in the microwave region for this older cable type anywhere > on the internet. (so far!) > 73 > Dave, ZL3FJ > > ______________________________________________________________ > Microwave mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/microwave > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Microwave at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > From tractorb at ihug.co.nz Sat Dec 3 23:32:36 2016 From: tractorb at ihug.co.nz (Dave Brown) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 17:32:36 +1300 Subject: [Microwave] Cable specs wanted References: <7596E1D23F254837B01DEDBCE3F86E6C@athlon3200> <58439361.2090706@netins.net> Message-ID: <0C5C6D1BE3C5401CBF4C93AC71EB6A52@athlon3200> Tks Jerry- yes-I have that data on the FSJ1/50A. Getting data on the older cable type is what I want as I have a quantity of it here. Forgot I had it actually! Just came across a box of it when sorting out some other cables a few days back. I suspect it will be similar - as regards loss at 10 GHz- to the A suffix current cable, but really want to get that confirmed- else I'll have to connectorise a few meters of it and make some measurements. 73 Dave, ZL3FJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" To: Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [Microwave] Cable specs wanted >I only found one Andrew catalog in my library, number 35 dated from 1991. >For FSJ1/50A it says good to 20.4 GHz and loss at 10 GHz is 21.8 dB / 100 >feet. > > LMR240 is a similar size and a length I had measured at MUD 2014 had half > the dB loss per 100 feet as good UT-141 at 10 GHz, though the catalog data > stops at 6 GHz. The measurement was 1.75 dB loss for 5'10" that would be > 30 dB /100 feet. Extrapolating the LMR plotted data shows 27.5 dB / 100 > feet at 10 GHz. > > 73, Jerry, K0CQ > > On 12/3/2016 8:47 PM, Dave Brown wrote: >> Looking for the attenuation figures for Andrew FSJ1/50- this is the >> older cable type, NOT the current type FSJ1/50A. I suspect they are >> similar but would like to have this confirmed. Particularly interested >> in attenuation figures for 10 GHz. I can't find any references to cable >> loss figures in the microwave region for this older cable type anywhere >> on the internet. (so far!) >> 73 >> Dave, ZL3FJ >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Microwave mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/microwave >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Microwave at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Microwave mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/microwave > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Microwave at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From geraldj at netins.net Sat Dec 3 23:37:07 2016 From: geraldj at netins.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 22:37:07 -0600 Subject: [Microwave] Cable specs wanted In-Reply-To: <0C5C6D1BE3C5401CBF4C93AC71EB6A52@athlon3200> References: <7596E1D23F254837B01DEDBCE3F86E6C@athlon3200> <58439361.2090706@netins.net> <0C5C6D1BE3C5401CBF4C93AC71EB6A52@athlon3200> Message-ID: <58439D73.3090006@netins.net> I found an older catalog on line, but catalog 26 didn't admit FSJ1-50, so its not a benefit. I did find a few references to FSJ1-50 using google but nothing to answer your questions. 73, Jerry, K0CQ On 12/3/2016 10:32 PM, Dave Brown wrote: > Tks Jerry- yes-I have that data on the FSJ1/50A. Getting data on the > older cable type is what I want as I have a quantity of it here. Forgot > I had it actually! Just came across a box of it when sorting out some > other cables a few days back. I suspect it will be similar - as regards > loss at 10 GHz- to the A suffix current cable, but really want to get > that confirmed- else I'll have to connectorise a few meters of it and > make some measurements. > 73 > Dave, ZL3FJ > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" > > To: > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 4:54 PM > Subject: Re: [Microwave] Cable specs wanted > > >> I only found one Andrew catalog in my library, number 35 dated from >> 1991. For FSJ1/50A it says good to 20.4 GHz and loss at 10 GHz is 21.8 >> dB / 100 feet. >> >> LMR240 is a similar size and a length I had measured at MUD 2014 had >> half the dB loss per 100 feet as good UT-141 at 10 GHz, though the >> catalog data stops at 6 GHz. The measurement was 1.75 dB loss for >> 5'10" that would be 30 dB /100 feet. Extrapolating the LMR plotted >> data shows 27.5 dB / 100 feet at 10 GHz. >> >> 73, Jerry, K0CQ >> >> On 12/3/2016 8:47 PM, Dave Brown wrote: >>> Looking for the attenuation figures for Andrew FSJ1/50- this is the >>> older cable type, NOT the current type FSJ1/50A. I suspect they are >>> similar but would like to have this confirmed. Particularly interested >>> in attenuation figures for 10 GHz. I can't find any references to cable >>> loss figures in the microwave region for this older cable type anywhere >>> on the internet. (so far!) >>> 73 >>> Dave, ZL3FJ >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Microwave mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/microwave >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Microwave at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >>> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Microwave mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/microwave >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Microwave at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Microwave mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/microwave > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Microwave at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >