AW: Fw: [Meteor-Scatter] CLX and FSK441

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:34:59 +0100

I do agree with you Hannu !

73 - Franz, OE3FVU

>-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]]Im Auftrag von Hannu
>Forsstr�m
>Gesendet: Samstag, 10. J�nner 2004 09:24
>Cc: [email protected]
>Betreff: Re: Fw: [Meteor-Scatter] CLX and FSK441
>
>
>I do not agree with Josep, though this is quite much the present way of
>operating. This suggestion is derived from purely central european
>interests and G�nter seems to think that north-europeans do not to work
>russian, italian, british stations at all.
>
>rgs,
>Hannu, OH6MAZ
>
>
>J.M.Prat wrote:
>
>> This looks a logic and good proposal Gunter, I agreed
>>
>> 73 de Josep EA3DXU
>>
>> For time slot multiplexing, I would prefer that a European core
>(JO40 radius
>> 1000km) transmits in the second period, while those outside
>transmit should
>> transmit in the first. Stations at the transit of the two zones
>are rare and
>> can decide freely according the the current situation where to transmit.
>>
>> 73, G�nter, DL4MEA
>>
>> PSE NOTE: I moved! JN58jd is no longer my QTH! I am now (and hopefully
>> forever) in JN58ri.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Meteor-Scatter mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/meteor-scatter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Meteor-Scatter mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/meteor-scatter
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Meteor-Scatter mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/meteor-scatter
>