[Meteor-Scatter] BCC is wors then cluster
Harry Popov
[email protected]
Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:25:25 +0200
Hi all,
Just to ask, why it is necessory to enclude all messages when you have to
say a word???
Today I received 20kb digest with just 3 messages in it. What will be the
lenght of the messages if the discussion continues longer?
About WSJT and 144.370:
- a second CQ freq will never work (rumember 144.400)
- I never make QSO in major showers on 144.370. In the last BCC I lost much
multipliers becouse they did not anounce QSY freq.... According to me even
loosing multipliers is not a reason to make QSOs on calling freq during
showers...
- ant at last do we need BCC any more?????
I heart many stations doing QSOs right over 144.370 and what was my
surprise when saw their claims on on4kst.chat that all their points were 3
per contact. Unfortunately there were LZ stations among them. One called me
on tropo to gain points...!!!???
There was an expedition from Z3 making most of his QSOs on 144.370, being
very ungry that YU7MON changed CQ period and the expedition station had to
give QSY dreq... (no comments)
I think cluster is not the problem but BCC is, In my oppinion it only
generates QRM and fake capabilities of ex eastern communistic countries.
Unfortunately there were westerns coping their behaviours!
This was my first and ever last participation in BCC. Guess the organizers
shoud concentrate on HSCW only or stop their activity.
73! Harry LZ1BB
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.559 / Virus Database: 351 - Release Date: 07.01.2004
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/plain (text body -- kept)
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---