[Meteor-Scatter] MS Procedures

Walter - OE6IWG (JN77pk) [email protected]
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 17:41:59 +0100


hi ulrich,

Ulrich Hilsinger wrote Sonntag, 4. Januar 2004 13:16:  
> Hello,
>
> why not just using the good practice known from 144.100, which has been
> used without problems for decades ? During my active HSCW MS time, from
> 1998 to approximately 2001, I've never seen any problem with the random
> procedure.

seems hscw is death ulrich, i called this morning abt 3 hours
on 144.100 "cq m" direction north and north-east, but nothing hrd, snieef.

> All your problems have been solved years ago for CW, it just seem that
> too many people are QRV now which do not know what they are doing...

yep ;O)

> Staying at 144.370 results in the same chaos known from 144.200. Modern
> transceiver have synthesizer controlled local oscillators, and usually
> have a big VFO knob allowing fast QSY... Just USE IT, don't discuss
> about it.

or we must wait 4 the big bang (collaps) on the calling-qrgs.
what shalls, i am not more this fighter some 25 years ago, it is only
our (nice) hobby  hi

-- 
73 es gl, de Walter - OE6IWG
JN77pk - EME Init #81
ICOM IC-7400 - MGF1302 - 4*10el - GS35b
http://www.oe6iwg.at