[Meteor-Scatter] G0NFA IO91 Perseids Report

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:14:54 -0000

>>As for making QSO's on KST Chat/Convers/Cluster/Etc. I wish that some type of
>>QSO Rule came into force, where 'Once QSO Sked details are made, then no more
>>chats on the sked until its completed. Unless to say Stop or change QRG,
>>Etc'.
>>I seem to see alot of  Did you send me a R38 or a R37, or are you sending me
>>Final Rogers, etc etc.  Just my opinion.

The rule exists, Derek. It clearly says that between the start and the end of a QSO NO INFORMATION or comments can be exchanged by
other ways (Other bands, Telephone, and Internet of course..), so that the contact can be considered good.

The problem is simply that some operators (some of them not newcomers, to my surprise) like to exchange all kind of details of the
progress of the QSO and simply ignore that rule. I have been frozen of how common this has become at ON4KST's chat and I really
cannot understand what kind of satisfaction these operators get of cheating QSOs.

Just my opinion anyway. Might be I am wrong and I should join them so that we all play with the same wrong rules :-((

73. Gabriel - EA6VQ
===================================================
E-Mail: [email protected]
Web-Site: HTTP://www.vhfdx.net
VQLog: HTTP://www.vqlog.com
Send formatted spots: HTTP://www.vhfdx.net/sendspots
===================================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:20 AM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [Meteor-Scatter] G0NFA IO91 Perseids Report
>
>
> Well, Perseids was a shower of sh e e e e e e Ooops, I mean - Not very good
> on Morning of 12th Aug.
>
> But this morning, Thurs 13th Aug I worked more and heard more than what was
> supposed to be the peak.
>
> This morning I worked....   IO91NE    200w 9 ele Tonna. poor take off from
> QTH.
> 13.08    F1JRD   R26 26 Completed very quickly with good long bursts. many
> pings.
> 13.08    EA3BB/2   Took a little while this one. Seemed to be sending my
> RRR's for
>                             ages to EA3BB/2.    26   R27
> 13.08    S53VV   Very weak bursts but plenty of them. JN65UM.  R26 27
> And then at 0640 I completed with IV3DXW in Slow CW.    This was IV3DXW First
>
>             QSO using slow CW.
> 13.08   IV3DXW   27/R27  Good strong bursts. Longest was 22seconds.
> Note: I am still not sure of the Reporting procedure of Slow CW, I assume it
> is the same as for SSB. Well that is what we used anyway.
>
> On what was supposed to be the peak. on 12.08 Weds I worked ....
>
> 01.11  EB1HJW   IN63IN   56    55   Tropo.
> 03.18  I5WBE      49 R27
> 03.57  IW0GPN    R27 27
> All these were made on Skeds made on Chat/Etc. No Random QSO's At All.
>
> As for making QSO's on KST Chat/Convers/Cluster/Etc. I wish that some type of
> QSO Rule came into force, where 'Once QSO Sked details are made, then no more
> chats on the sked until its completed. Unless to say Stop or change QRG,
> Etc'.
> I seem to see alot of  Did you send me a R38 or a R37, or are you sending me
> Final Rogers, etc etc.  Just my opinion.
>
> Good Luck All and I will try and get all the reports onto the  <A HREF="http://www.144mhz.co.uk/">VUSHF Daily
> News http://www.144mhz.co.uk</A>
>
> Derek - [email protected]
> IO91NE  -   And Just going to go and collect the new HA8UG GS35 Amp and new
> Rig.  Lots more Squigglies. hihi
>  <A HREF="http://www.144mhz.co.uk/">VUSHF Daily News http://www.144mhz.co.uk</A>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---
> _______________________________________________
> Meteor-Scatter mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/meteor-scatter
>
>